An independent review has sparked significant debate within the rugby community by recommending the abolition of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) Council. This council, composed of 63 voluntary members from various sectors including England's counties, the military, and Oxbridge, plays a crucial role in overseeing the RFU's board and regulating the game.

Proposed Changes

Under the new proposals, the Council could be entirely disbanded or replaced with a smaller group of appointed advisors. This move aims to streamline decision-making processes and enhance the efficiency of rugby governance.

Voices from the Review

Ed Warner, one of the authors of the review, stated, "I've no doubt this will rankle with a number of existing Council members. But I am hopeful that the logic of this streamlined structure, empowering those within community rugby, will win the hearts and minds of the majority." Warner also criticized the current structure as "clearly unfit for the modern era."

Impact on Rugby Governance

The review highlighted several issues with the current system, including complex and slow decision-making processes, poor communication, and unwieldy bureaucracy that burdens grassroots volunteers. RFU chief executive Bill Sweeney has expressed support for devolving more control of the community game to local levels, a move that could foster greater involvement and responsiveness at the grassroots level.

Future Steps

After a consultation period ending in June, final recommendations will be presented to the Council in autumn. This could lead to the Council rubberstamping its own demise, with members' privileges and perks potentially being phased out over time.

Conclusion

These proposed changes represent a significant shift in how rugby is governed in England, aiming to create a more agile and effective structure that better serves the modern needs of the sport and its community.