Tennis Players vs Governing Bodies: Unpacking the Lawsuit and Future Prospects
Explore the ongoing legal battle between tennis players and governing bodies, the grievances of the PTPA, and what the future holds for the sport.



The Legal Battle in Tennis: An Overview
The Professional Tennis Players' Association (PTPA) has initiated legal action against tennis' governing bodies in the US, the UK, and the EU. Representing the entire player population, the PTPA is challenging several issues, including the prize money formula, the grueling 11-month schedule, and invasive personal device searches.
The Formation of the PTPA
Founded on August 30, 2020, by Novak Djokovic and Vasek Pospisil, the PTPA aims to exclusively serve players' interests. The association seeks increased prize money, especially at Grand Slam tournaments, and aims to address the unsustainable scheduling that impacts player welfare.
Key Grievances of the PTPA
The PTPA alleges collusion between tours and tournaments, which they claim suppresses competition and artificially restricts prize money. Additionally, the association is pushing to end invasive searches and random middle-of-the-night drug tests conducted by the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA).
Current Efforts by Governing Bodies
Both the ATP and WTA have defended their practices, highlighting increases in prize money and security measures. The ATP has introduced a profit-sharing model and raised prize money by $70 million over the past five years. The WTA also reports a significant boost in prize money distribution.
Potential for Settlement
While the PTPA seeks reform, there is no intention to split the sport as seen in golf with LIV Tour. Settlement out of court remains a goal, though the path to negotiation is fraught with challenges due to existing tensions between the PTPA and governing bodies.