Political Stalemate Over Abramovich's Chelsea Funds: UK Ministers Yet to Act
The UK government faces increasing pressure to release £2.5bn from Roman Abramovich's Chelsea sale for Ukraine humanitarian aid amidst political disagreements.






The ongoing political deadlock over the release of £2.5bn from Roman Abramovich's sale of Chelsea Football Club continues to draw significant attention. The funds, originally pledged for humanitarian aid in Ukraine, remain frozen in a UK bank account, despite mounting pressure on Labour ministers to act.
The Background
Roman Abramovich, the former owner of Chelsea FC, was compelled to sell the club in 2022 following UK government sanctions due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The £2.5bn raised from the sale was intended to support humanitarian efforts in Ukraine. However, the funds have yet to be disbursed, leaving many to question the reasons behind the delay.
Political Pressure
Labour ministers are increasingly under scrutiny to engage with Abramovich’s representatives or the foundation established to manage the funds. Despite ongoing discussions between the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and Abramovich’s team, there have been no meetings involving Labour ministers since the general election last year.
Sticking Points
The primary issue revolves around disagreements between the UK government and Abramovich’s legal team. While Abramovich insists on using the funds to aid all victims of the Ukraine war, including those outside the country, the UK government advocates for a more localized approach, focusing solely on humanitarian efforts within Ukraine.
International Implications
The matter is further complicated by Abramovich’s Portuguese citizenship and EU sanctions. Portuguese authorities have issued an exemption allowing the funds to be used exclusively for humanitarian purposes in Ukraine, aligning with EU and UK sanctions.
Humanitarian Urgency
With the war in Ukraine now in its third year, the need for humanitarian aid has never been more pressing. Organizations like Save the Children have criticized the delay, emphasizing that the funds could have provided critical support to children affected by the conflict.
Looking Ahead
The foundation managing the funds has a comprehensive plan ready for immediate implementation once the funds are released. This includes programs to support orphans of Ukrainian soldiers and address health, housing, and education needs for those fleeing the war. The UK government’s failure to act has been labeled as 'incomprehensible' by a House of Lords committee, further underscoring the urgency for a resolution.
Conclusion
As the political standoff continues, the stakes remain high for both the UK government and the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine. The need for decisive action is imperative to ensure that the promised funds reach those in desperate need.